Before I start this post I just want to send out a huge thank you to all of the folks who wrote to YouTube (last I counted we were 717 strong), created videos, signed my petition and offered support when I needed it most. Without you I don’t think Sex Ed 102 would be what it was, is, and will grow to be (new videos will be out soon, my comp hates me right now and I can’t edit anything until I get it back. Until then, laptoppin it).
As for YouTube, after months of unanswered emails and the assumption that they just didn’t give a shit about me, you, or offering honest, helpful, informative and non judgmental sex ed/advice to the deserving masses, I received the unexpected – a letter from YouTube (though I’m damn near positive it’s auto-generated):
“Hi hollidaychild,
Thanks for your email. Your “hollidaychild” account has been suspended due to repeated or severe violations of our Terms of Use and claims of copyright infringement. Suspended accounts cannot be reinstated. Federal law requires that we terminate accounts when there are repeated claims of copyright infringement. Because you have had other videos rejected in the past, we are unable to reinstate your account. Users with suspended or terminated accounts are prohibited from creating new accounts or accessing YouTube’s community. In order for your account to be reinstated, you will need to resolve at least one of the following video removals.
The following videos have been removed from your account:
Penalty 1:
“Exploring the Female Body” formerly at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhhuG7i1Ea0
Removed for violating our Terms of Use on 08/25/2009.
Please see http://www.youtube.com/t/terms and http://www.youtube.com/t/community_guidelines
Penalty 2:
“Vaginal Stimulation” formerly at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RE0bmHKiVc
Removed for violating our Terms of Use on 11/11/2009.
Please see http://www.youtube.com/t/terms and http://www.youtube.com/t/community_guidelines
Penalty 3:
“ANAL BEADS” formerly at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EaOnr12eoxA
Removed for violating our Terms of Use on 11/11/2009.
Please see http://www.youtube.com/t/terms and http://www.youtube.com/t/community_guidelines
Penalty 4:
“Purring Thrusting Panther” formerly at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pgGAQFb1Bxw
Removed for violating our Terms of Use on 11/03/2011.
Please see http://www.youtube.com/t/terms and http://www.youtube.com/t/community_guidelines
Penalty 5:
“Sex Ed 102 – Blooper Reel” formerly at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQx-LjNin6k
Removed for violating our Terms of Use on 11/06/2011.
Please see http://www.youtube.com/t/terms and http://www.youtube.com/t/community_guidelines
Penalty 6:
“Tenga Soft Tube Onacup” formerly at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cplIW_JecA
Removed for violating our Terms of Use on 11/07/2011.
Please see http://www.youtube.com/t/terms and http://www.youtube.com/t/community_guidelines
IMPORTANT: If you feel a content owner has misidentified your content as infringing, you may be able to resolve one or more of these penalties by filing a counter-notification. For more information, please visit our Help Center article about counter-notifications at http://help.youtube.com/support/youtube/bin/answer.py?answer=59826.
Regards,
The YouTube Team“
Now here’s where I have a few problems:
First of all, there were no “claims of copyright infringement” on any of my Sex Ed 102 videos. Ever. Not a one. And being that the music in my intro/outro was written by my husbands band, with numerous permission forms sent in to state that I’m allowed to use it, I can’t see why they’d even suggest that. (You can find Methodology’s music here <- shameless plug).
Secondly, that whole “Federal Law” line is a complete load of horseshit. Yeah, I said it. Horse. Shit. I know of numerous YouTube Partners and creators who have used music without permission, yet got nothing but a slap on the wrist. Furthermore, being that there couldn’t have been repeated claims of copyright infringement I second the statement that it’s horse shit.
Third, and I think the one that pisses me off the most, since when is educating females about their body in a respectful, professional and informative way a “severe violations of our Terms of Use”?? No, seriously?? I mean it. Type the words “Female Sexuality” into the YouTube search bar and you get over 10 pages filled with videos. Yet my video “Exploring the Female Body” was so inappropriately done that it violated the Terms Of Use??? WTF YouTube. What. The. Fuck! I’m sorry but this shit just ain’t right. How’s about you get it together and start focusing on removing videos of booty clappin (even though their hilarious when drunk), animal cruelty (don’t watch any of the videos unless you want to end up crying into your tequila for an hour while forming a serious hatred for human beings), girls that could be 12 dancing on their webcam (for the record I’m not against webcam work, but when you cant determine the age of the person – yeah, it’s a no g0 in my books), and violent videos of people getting beat up (um, I’m sorry YouTube, but in case you didn’t notice this bullshit is against your “Community Guidelines” as per the statement “Graphic or gratuitous violence is not allowed. If your video shows someone getting hurt, attacked, or humiliated, don’t post it.” considering the one video I posted has 145,000 views I’m pretty sure someone at the office has seen it by now and yet didn’t remove it #HYPOCRITICALBULLSHIT). And that’s just the tip of the ice berg.
While I’m ranting about the crap you can find on YouTube, let me not forget to include the following as it seems like another pile of steaming horseshit that this is making shit tonnes money via the Partner Program, yet my content is perpetually flagged, removed and censored: For those of you that don’t know of KassemG he’s one of the ‘elite’ YouTubers who went big a few years ago. I lost track of him after he made a video joking about rape (go about 1:40 in then watch), but apparently he can make videos interviewing female porn stars. Yet I can’t teach women to love their bodies. Go YouTube, you’re doing a fantastic job in the liberation of female sexuality!! <- I’m spitting venom as I type that. *for the record the videos aren’t that bad, and in some cases fairly interesting since you get to see the girls from another perspective not spread eagle. But still, he can do that but I can’t inform. Nice. Real nice.
Fourth, the fact that they removed a “Blooper Reel” for “violating our Terms of Use” is so beyond bizarre that even I can’t get my head around it. Since when in the hell did a blooper reel violate a Terms of Use? Furthermore, why is it that the other two blooper reels I made stayed up (even being offered Partnership and ad placements) yet this one was so terrible it needed to be removed? It’s this kind of b.s. that makes me seriously question if they’ve got rabid monkeys throwing shit as their approval department. No, it can’t be. Even a damn monkey would know this wasn’t worthy of removal.
Fifth, how in the hell do videos that were removed 2 years ago still come into play?? This is one thing that seriously baffles me when it comes to how YouTube conducts itself. Maybe I’m wrong but I think that there should be a time frame where previous video removals are no longer an issue so long as there have been no infractions in at least 6 months to a year (from when they were flagged/removed).
Sixth (God this numbering thing is just getting stupid), being that YouTube has a flagging system for ‘mature content’ why don’t they just flag the appropriate videos and keep them online for those with a mature mindset or parental permission to see? It seems to me that would be a far more realistic option. On that note, considering that others like Dan & Jenn, Dodson & Ross, Kicesie, LaciGreen (of Sex+), Davey Wavey and others get to create sex positive content, why is it that mine is flagged, removed and terminated? Yet another steaming pile of hypocritical horse shit if you ask me.
*no hate to those I mentioned (I actually support them all), I just think it’s bullshit that others can create topics on Sex Ed yet I can’t.
Finally, if intimate accessories are off the list of what’s accepted by YouTube why is it that typing the words ‘sex toy’ generates over 10 pages worth of hits, “vibrating butt plug” over 7 pages worth of hits and “g-spot vibrator” gets over 10 pages worth of hits? Okay, wait, let me get this straight: my videos have been flagged, removed and actually had the entire account terminated, yet there’s still pages upon pages of reviews and sex toy videos on the website? Clearly I’m being made an example of, that or someone in their offices seriously hates me. Either way, it’s totally uncalled for, unfair, and silly .
*for the record, in the past numerous ‘review’ videos of mine had been flagged and removed, only to be reinstated with the ‘mature content’ once I wrote to my contact within YouTube. They even gave my Fleshlight video a preemptive ‘mature content’ rating before it went live just so it wouldn’t be removed by the system, leaving me to believe that helping men jerk off is okay, but helping women do the same thing is bad. Good on ya YouTube!
As per the last sentence in the email they sent “ In order for your account to be reinstated, you will need to resolve at least one of the following video removals.” I sent an email to all of my YouTube contacts stating why I feel they were in the wrong, how my videos are important and emphasized the fact that from day one my intention has been to help, guide, inform and provide a safe space for learning about ones self, their partner or any other sexually related topic they seek to learn about. There is no way I’m going down without fighting for something I believe in, and I believe in this.
We’ll see what happens…

Facebook
Twitter
Tumblr











































